Can Anyone Else See Obama Smiling …..?

Barack Obama Text Message Marketing Screenshot 2

Barack Obama Text Message Marketing Screenshot 2 (Photo credit: DavidErickson)

Have you forgotten already? Or … do you remember Solyndra and Obama’s enlightened administration granting them a $528 million stimulus loan despite the OMB’s warning Solyndra would go bankrupt.  OMB even got the date right!

And … do you remember Beacon Power who got a $43 million loan guarantee from Obama.  Well, they also went bankrupt.

Now we have Ener1, who got a $118 million grant from Obama … and guess what … they filed for bankruptcy Thursday.

Do you see a pattern emerging here?  All three company were Obama bundlers or supporters!  All got millions of tax payer’s dollars as Obama touted them as leaders of the new clean and green energy industry his administration will “not walk away from!”  Well, they got the green and then they cleaned up … but the taxpayers got screwed!

This is the change you cool-aid drinkers voted for!   Crony-capitalism!  Inept and corrupt leadership! Let’s see … what else:

  • New home purchases fell in 2011 … making it the worst year for home sales in U.S history … despite Obama’s claims.
  • Obama’s new Labor Board chief is going to push union organizing rules!  No surprise here!
  • How about the 36 Obama aides who owe $833,000 in back taxes.  Tim Geithner would be so proud!
  • Did anyone else listen to Obama’s State of the Union speech’s key points … exactly the same as 2010 … slightly different wording.  Yet no improvement … why?  Because he is an arrogant, corrupt, anti-American, lead -from-behind fraud who is enjoying his many $4 million vacations and playing endless golf games at tax payer cost!  No wonder he wants to raise taxes!!

Read’em and weep suckers!

And what is happening with our conservative movement now? Why is everyone ganging up on Newt Gingrich and calling him unstable, a non-conservative, and an opponent of President Reagan’s policies, etc?  The truth is the Republican’s wouldn’t have been able to take back the House in the 90′s without Newt.  So why is he now being trashed so vehemently?  I will tell you why!  It is because the republican establishment has decided it wants to have Mitt Romney, a genuine phony conservative, as its candidate.

Romney, for his part, is trying to pretend he is not part of the Republican Establishment and is doing whatever he can to smear Newt by running dishonest negative campaign ads (Oops, I mean ads his Super PAC is running!).

They even came up with a bogus video to portray Gingrich bashing Reagan!

Let’s look at some real facts, shall we:

The charge that Newt’s resigned as Speaker of the House in disgrace is a smoke screen. He did resign and pay some fines for supposedly miss-classifying a college course he taught as tax exempt.  The charge was leveled at Gingrich as a last ditch effort by a political opponent Gingrich was defeating in an election. Nobody likes to remember that after Gingrich resigned … a thorough investigation by the IRS determined that Newt Gingrich actually did nothing wrong.

Two former members of Ronald Reagan’s political machine, Mark Levine and Jeffery Lord, have both gone on record as saying the assertions that Gingrich was a problem for President Reagan and not a Reaganite conservative are, simply put, CRAP!  If Gingrich had been as much a problem as Romney and others portray, he would most certainly have been mentioned in Reagan’s autobiography more than once.  These two guys were there!  They were in the meetings!  And they both say Gingrich was a strong Reagan supporter and a key team player.

If Gingrich were not, would First Lady Nancy Reagan, a lady of remarkable strength and personal integrity who strongly supported her husband, have praised Gingrich when speaking at the 1995 Goldwater Institute Dinner by saying:

“They believed that government should simply get out of the way. Ronnie and Barry fought for those principles, which, today, have been overwhelmingly embraced,” Reagan said. “So they must have done something right. Just take a look at the extraordinary men and women who make up the 104th Congress and of course its distinguished speaker, Newt Gingrich. The dramatic movement of 1995 is an outgrowth of a much earlier crusade that goes back half a century. Barry Goldwater handed the torch to Ronnie, and, in turn, Ronnie turned that torch over to Newt and the Republican members of Congress to keep that dream alive.”

The House, under Gingrich’s leadership did balance the budget 4 times, reformed Welfare under Bill Clinton, and did create strong economic growth and created over 11 million jobs.  Can Mitt say anything close to that?

And what about Mitt Romney?  Let’s look at a few more facts:

  • Romney’s own adviser Norm Coleman said that they wouldn’t be appealing Obamacare entirely.  Why?
  • In 1994, Mitt Romney did his level best to distance himself from President Reagan, calling himself an independent.
  • In 2002, when running for Governor of Massachusetts, Mitt Romney clearly stated that he is not a partisan Republican and that his views were progressive.

Ron Paul is no saint in this picture either.  Remember when he resigned from the Republican Party in 1987, and actually did bash President Reagan saying:

If Ronald Reagan couldn’t or wouldn’t balance the budget, which Republican leader on the horizon can we possibly expect to do so? There is no credibility left for the Republican Party as a force to reduce the size of government. That is the message of the Reagan years.

I conclude that one must look to other avenues if a successful effort is ever to be achieved in reversing America’s direction.

I therefore resign my membership in the Republican Party and enclose my membership card.

I would really like to see the Republican candidates get beyond these personal attacks and negative ads, and concentrate on the issues.  If you go to their respective websites, they all have plans to fix the economy, or reform the tax laws, etc. posted there.  Why has no debate “monitor” asked the candidates about these plans?  So Gingrich made money selling his expertise?  So Romney is rich?  So what?  All the candidates have their flaws.  There is no perfect candidate out there!  Any one of these potential candidates would be better than Obama!!

Conservatives have to concentrate on one thing!  Defeating Obama!!!  Whichever candidate ends up winning the nomination will need the REAL SUPPORT of the other candidates and their supporters to beat Obama.  If this gets too nasty, and they take their toys and go home … Obama will win re-election.  In fact, I think that is what he is banking on!  America, as conservative know and love it, cannot survive four more years of Obama!

Chicago Tribune Tells Obama: Do Not Run!

President Barack Obama is seen speaking with U...

Image via Wikipedia

I rarely find myself agreeing with left-wing democrats, but sometimes the opportunity presents itself … even if idea is approached from different perspectives.  The “Anointed One” received a message on Monday from Steve Chapman, a veteran columnist for the Chicago Tribune, in an OP/ED piece saying, “please don’t run for re-election.”

And … this is the same Chicago hometown newspaper that endorsed Obama when he descended from on high to bring us all “hope and change”  in 2008.  Can you say … “oops!?”

Now, I understand that Steve Chapman wants Hillary to run! It is the progressive-liberal’s (i.e. communists who have bought out the democratic party) only chance to keep power.  Chapman wrote, “Her husband presided over a boom, she’s been busy deposing dictators instead of destroying jobs, and she’s never been accused of being a pushover.” 

Well, some of that is sort of true I guess . Bill Clinton did preside over a booming economy …  created for him by President Reagan‘s policies.   But, I am not sure which dictators Hillary actually deposed.  that would be a lot for a Secretary of State to pull off.  Anyway, Obama single-handedly took out Osama Bin Laden and Muammar Gaddafi … just ask him … he’ll tell you.

I guess there is no chance of getting Steve Chapman to support Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, or Rick Perry!  Too bad … that is more like what this country needs now!

I do wish that Obama would gracefully bow out and not run for re-election.  Or … he could just quit.  Personally, I think he should be impeached for treason; because I believe he has actively worked toward the destruction of this country so he could re-create it in his  version of an Obama lead “benevolent” dictatorship.  It is the only thing that makes sense when you really look at the steps he has taken:

  • Increased government intrusion into private sector.
  • Created his “Czarist” shadow government.
  • Imposed Obamacare on Americans even though the greatest majority of Americans opposed it.
  • Tried to impose “Cap and Tax” by imperial decree.
  • Instituted several “eSnitch” programs encouraging citizens to spy on each other for him.
  • Tax the private sector into submission.
  • Created massive new governmental regulation by “executive order” costing Americans billions annually.
  • Destroyed American jobs while supporting job growth in Brazil and Canada.
  • Consistently ignored the U.S. Constitution and actively supported suppressing individual rights.
  • Appointed administrative officials that are totally unqualified for their jobs based on their left-wing ideology.
  • Apologized to the “radical” world for America’s greatness.

He has done way more than enough damage to our country’s economy, destroyed the job market, irresponsibly increased the national debt, destroyed our country’s morale, and lowered our international standing. Obama does not believe America is exceptional.  He does not believe in private property.  He does not believe in limited-government. He does not believe in individual rights.  He is, perhaps, American by accident of birth; but he is not American in his heart!

In no way should this be construed as an endorsement for Hillary Clinton.  Talk about a lessor of two evils!!  She would do only slightly less damage than that which Obama has wrought on our great nation.  But then, even Dick Cheney said Hillary would, at least, be better than Obama!

All Conservatives are Crazy, Stupid, Racist and Evil SOBS!

Dan Gainor published this article on September 6, 2011 on FoxNews.com.  It is absolutely crazy how the progressive-liberals and their mainstream media lap-dogs castigate and spew their vitriolic lies about the Tea Party and American conservatives.  I think it is a sign as to just how desperate they are.  Here is Dan Gainor’s article in its entirety:

Conservatives are crazy. Sometimes they’re stupid, racist or even evil. On creative occasions they’re all four – at least that’s how they’re portrayed by the American media. All that reflects the typical lefty view that right-wingers are “son of bitches” who need to be taken out, as Teamsters President Jimmy Hoffa so sweetly explained. Hoffa envisions a “good fight” because his opponents must be the opposite – evil.

This election season, journalists have partnered fully with the left to depict conservatives in the most vile ways they can muster. While it’s nothing new, the sheer volume of attacks is noteworthy. What’s worse is that many are coming from supposedly legitimate news operations. . (It is fun to note this nasty attack comes just days before Obama pushes his latest “bipartisan” legislative effort.)

Every national conservative politician battles these media characterizations. 

Ronald Reagan was crazy or stupid, depending on the lefty arguing it or the phases of the moon. Nancy Reagan was allegedly the power behind the throne, so she was crazy and evil. 

President George H.W. Bush once ran the CIA – evil. 

His son, President George W. Bush, managed to be crazy, stupid and evil. (Lefties liked to depict him in Nazi regalia or as a chimp, or both. Conservatives who use identical phrasing or images for Obama are, of course, category four – racists.) Vice President Dick Cheney got the Nancy Reagan treatment – crazy and evil.

It’s almost a party game to list the top conservatives and describe how the media and left are depicting them. But it’s no game to candidates. Prominent media outlets are trying to sabotage every viable conservative opponent to Obama.

Rep. Michele Bachman, (R-Wis.), is called crazy for her gas price predictions or for just being her. Newsweek’s Aug. 15 cover story on Bachmann was called “The Queen of Rage,” complete with a cover photo of a crazy-eyed candidate. “In Iowa, where she was raised, Bachmann has become the living embodiment of the Tea Party. She and her allies have been called a maniacal gang of knife-wielding ideologues. That’s hyperbole, of course,” wrote Lois Romano. When reporters write something that vile and follow it with “that’s hyperbole,” what they really mean is “no, it’s not.”

Then there’s ESPN’s L.Z. Granderson, also a CNN contributor, who called Bachmann “crazy.” Granderson said that “the people aren’t going to vote for crazy. And she [Bachmann] still registers as crazy with a lot of independents.” But those attacks were repurposing the lefty theme that has been around for years. Crazy Mother Jones magazine called her “Bachmann (R-Crazy)” in a 2008 headline.

With Bachmann now running for president, Matt Taibbi resurrected that assault in Rolling Stone’s June 22 issue. “Bachmann is a religious zealot whose brain is a raging electrical storm of divine visions and paranoid delusions.” Taibbi summed it up by saying she’s “exactly the right kind of completely batshit crazy. Not medically crazy, not talking-to-herself-on-the-subway crazy, but grandiose crazy, late-stage Kim Jong-Il crazy.”

Then there’s stupid, a subject the old school media know all too well. Politico, the lefty publication that caters to Washington insiders, ran an Aug. 29 cover story with the headline: “Is Rick Perry dumb?” This sterling bit of journalism began with the premise that Perry is “confronting an unavoidable question: is he dumb – or just misunderestimated?” (That last bit is a dig at Bush the Younger, of course.)

This theme has been everywhere for years, enshrined even in T-shirt form as a red-white-and-blue elephant with the slogan: “Never Underestimate the Power of Stupid People in Large Numbers.”

Tune into MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” and there’s co-host Mika Brzezinski bashing the right for not hiking taxes in the debt limit negotiations. “I think the Republicans look stupid and mean. I’m sorry, this is stupid.” 

It’s a common theme over at MSNBC: conservatives are stupid. “Sarah Palin Has Proven Herself To Be Profoundly Stupid,” whined “Hardball” host Chris Matthews.

If it’s evil you want, Matthews throws that term around like beads at Mardi Gras. Let’s see: Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck are evil: These people are evil in what they’re doing.” All because he thinks they’re wrong about climate change. Then Matthews bashed former Speaker Newt Gingrich as “evil” and looking “like the devil.”

The media pile on Perry as the front runner. ABC’s Jim Avila called out conservative Texans as evil, even if you didn’t quite use the word. “Some argue that, deep in the heart of Rick Perry’s Texas, there is little heart.” “Some.” That’s another journalist weasel word, allowing Avila to say what he actually feels without owning up. It’s the same theme over on the left, typically blasting the Koch brothers with the term. A 2010 Gawker headline explained it only a bit tongue-in-cheek: “Republican Billionaires Arrange Secret Meeting to Plot Evil.”

Those attacks are awful, but the scarlet letter attack in today’s world earns the “R” for racism. Matthews is good at that one too, saying Perry “could be Bull Connor with a smile.” Matthews gave the Bull Connor comparison to Perry twice. (Connor was a civil rights era racist who unleashed police dogs and turned fire hoses on protesters. He was also a Democrat.)

If you’re white, even a bogus claim of racism is almost impossible to defend against. It’s the favorite of charlatans and media hounds, and a persistent media theme since Obama first announced for president. Everybody who’s anybody – the Tea Party, Fox, the GOP and more – are all racists for daring to oppose Obama.

Donald Trump’s request to see Obama’s grades? “That’s just code for saying he got into law school because he was black,” explained CBS’s Bob Schieffer.

MSNBC’s lefty religious expert Frank Schaeffer tells viewers about “a racist white bloc in the Republican Party that has come dressed as the Tea Party.”

Even black GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain gets abused as “racist.” TV nutball pundits from foul-mouthed comedian Bill Maher to massively inked, one-time comedienne Janeane Garofalohave criticized his candidacy – supposedly designed to deflect “the racism that is inherent in the Republican Party, the conservative movement, the tea party certainly.” Garofalo actually claimed Cain was being paid to fend off charges of racism against the GOP. Of course, you can’t fend off such disgusting charges. Even a lunatic like Garofalo knows that.

Because such charges get repeated dozens, hundreds or thousands of times. The examples above are just scratching the surface. We could fill newspapers with these outlandish claims, if any bothered to print such truth. Crazy, stupid, evil and racist. The four horsemen of the liberal media apocalypse this election. And every one of them has already been set loose.

What’s Wrong With Left-Wing, Secular-Progressive Liberals?

Revisiting Reaganism

According to the out-spoken conservative pundit, Ann Coulter, left-wing, secular-progressive liberals have been on the wrong side of every foreign policy issue from the Cold War fight against communism right up through today’s War on Terror today … and you know what? I think she is right!

Ann Coulter

Under democratic presidents like Truman, Kennedy, Carter, and Clinton, the United States did pursue policies of appeasement, containment, and surrender … and has often sacrificed American interests and security to placate anti-American interests.

Left-wing, secular-progressive liberals do, in fact, seem to have an extraordinary knack for always taking the anti-American stand … or as Ann Coulter says, a stand “on the side of treason.”

President Ronald Reagan

Ronald Reagan despised the idea of containment … he felt that that containment was wrong and simply a cowards way out of standing up for American principles. Reagan believed that containment, while perhaps curtailing communism from spreading much farther, doomed hundreds of thousands of our fellow human beings in the “contained area” controlled by the Soviet Union to lives of hopelessness and despair as slaves of a a military dictatorship masquerading as a communist totalitarian regime. That was why, from day one, President Reagan had the steadfast goal of bringing down the Soviet Union by forcing them into economic ruin via the arms race.

By the way … have you ever seen a communist country that wasn’t, in reality, a military dictatorship hiding behind a communist facade?  I haven’t!

Left-Wing Secular-Progressive Liberals Are Not “Just Americans” To …

Left-wing, secular-progressive liberals do not “love” America. They hate it and everything it stands for … individual freedom, limited government, and personal responsibility. They want to turn America into another socialist nightmare patterned after that shining example of European liberalism … France!

“Hanoi Jane” Fonda

The credibility of left-wing liberal democrats in the area of national defense is severely lacking. I mean, after all, their defense strategy is planned by folks like “Hanoi Jane” Fonda, Ed Asner, Susan Sarandon, Casey Casem, Noam Chomsky, Gore Vidal, and noted cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal.

By the way, this group is virtually the same group that supported the Soviet Union during the Cold War!

Jimmy Carter

Former president, Jimmy Carter, said “There is no current danger to the United States from Baghdad.” The real threat to world peace and global human rights is President George Bush.

This is the same Jimmy Carter who so ineffectively handled the Iran hostage crisis, who couldn’t land a helicopter in the desert, and who was more concerned with the White House tennis court schedule than important affairs of state. Maybe he was just outraged that the members of al-Qaeda incarcerated at Guantanamo Bay don’t have proper access to regulation tennis courts… I don’t know.

Saddam Hussein

I do know Jimmy Carter felt that, unlike that evil warmongering demon from Hell George Bush, a cold-blooded, murdering, and habitually lying noble statesman like Saddam Hussein … could be reasoned with.

Here is America … engaged in a global, ideologically based war against radical Islamic terrorists bent on our death and destruction … and left-wing progressive liberals like former president Jimmy Carter are offering aid and support to the terrorists and nations who support them!

When President Bush included North Korea in his “axis of evil” with Iraq and Iran, left-wing liberals apologized to the world and announced to all that President Bush was simply a “moron.”

After all, these three countries have nothing in common. USA Today, a bulwark for the profound and intelligent reporting of pertinent news, was quick to point out that “Koreans don’t even look like Iranians” (see example below).

Korean

A Korean

Iranian Guard

An Iranian

Talk about morons! America is at war with radical terrorists bent on bombing us off the face of the planet and slitting the throats of our reporters and peace volunteers on world television, Iran is supporting them and actively pursuing a nuclear arsenal, North Korea , the pillar of liberal democracy that it is, is testing nuclear weapons … and the left-wing, secular-progressive liberals’ answer is to play word games.

  • Madeleine Albright, Bill Clinton’s secretary of state, said “We know that Korea is dangerous, but lumping those three countries together is dangerous.
  • Jimmy Carter chimed in with the brilliant statement that the term, “axis of evil,” is “overly simplistic and counterproductive.”
  • Robert Scheer wrote in the Los Angeles Times that “no such axis exists.”

The “Axis of Appeasement” … when faced with danger from three rogue nations who are wreaking havoc in the civilized world and actively seeking nuclear arms … chooses to engage in “semantic nit-picking.”

Racial Profiling … You bet!

9/11 Hijackers

Our left-wing secular-progressive liberal friends also tell us it is wrong to “racially profile” young Arab males… and look for radical Islamic terrorists at our international airports. We must also search the 99-year-old white lady in her wheelchair in order to be “fair” … or at least politically correct!

What kind of idiotic nonsense is that?

To be fair, not all followers of Islam are terrorists … but … 99% of the terrorists trying to bomb us out of existence are followers of Islam.

Let’s review …

  1. On September 11, 2001, more than three thousand Americans were murdered in a brutal terrorist attack on U.S. soil by radical radical Islamic extremists.
  2. In October 2000, our warship the USS Cole was attacked by radical Islamic extremists.
  3. In 1998, the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by radical Islamic extremists.
  4. In 1996, a U.S. Air Force housing complex in Saudi Arabia was bombed by radical Islamic extremists.
  5. In 1995, five Americans were killed by a car bomb set off by radical Islamic extremists.
  6. In 1993, the World Trade center was bombed by radical Islamic extremists.
  7. In 1988, a passenger jet, Pan Am Flight 103, was bombed by radical Islamic extremists.
  8. In 1986, a West Berlin discotheque frequented by American servicemen was bombed by radical Islamic extremists.
  9. In 1985, an Italian cruise ship, the Achille Lauro, was seized by radical Islamic extremists and a sixty-nine-year-old American was killed.
  10. In 1983, the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut were blown up by radical Islamic extremists.
  11. In 1982, the U.S. embassy in Beirut was bombed by radical Islamic extremists.
  12. In 1979, the U.S. embassy in Iran was stormed by radical Islamic extremists and the American embassy staff was held hostage for 444 days.

I may not be a rocket scientist, or even Ann Coulter, but in 20 years of continual attacks on America by radical Islamic extremists, even I can find the common thread here. It seems to me that … in every one of these attacks by radical Islamic extremists … there are definitely one or more radical Islamic extremists involved!

So, of course, it makes total sense to not allow American law enforcement officials to look for radical Islamic extremists …

The Left-Wing Secular-Liberal Liberal God Complex

What is the basic difference between conservatives and secular-progressive liberals?  Conservatives believe that man was created in God’s image …. and secular-progressive liberals claim that God is a fairy tale.   This claim then allows them to pretend to be Gods.

ACLU Nativity Scene

This left-wing, secular-progressive liberal God complex does seem to explain why they feel free to murder unborn children, forcibly create their version of equality through programs like affirmative action and wealth redistribution … while remaining untouched by it all in their wealthy elitist liberal enclaves.

It explains why they feel noble about spreading pornography throughout our nation’s schools in the form of mandatory sex education classes where 8-year-olds learn the proper method of placing condoms on a bananas and how to get abortions without their parents consent.

It also explains why an activist liberal judge can sentence a pedophile who molested a young girl continuously over a period of 11 years to six weeks of counseling

  • and why the ACLU can justify defending an organization like NAMBLA, that promotes men kidnapping and seducing young boys …
  • while they sue the city of San Francisco to kick the Boy Scouts out of Balboa Park.

Maybe the $950,000 in attorney’s fees and court costs the ACLU fleeced from hard-working American taxpayers during the “Boy Scout” case helped to ease their collective conscience.  You think?

Liberals are Gods

Perhaps this is also why they revere the U.N. so … instead of their own country. After all, the U.N is not founded on Judeo-Christian principles like America is. Instead, the U.N. is simply a corrupt, non-judgmental … and horribly incompetent … liberal institution.   Hmmmm …. I think I see a correlation forming in my mind!

Left-wing, secular-progressive liberals aren’t Americans … they are simply God wannabes!  They thirst for political power, for money, and for an America that will no longer be able to judge them for their obscene aristocratic lifestyles. Hey … that sounds just like Monica Lewinsky’s ex-boyfriend’s wife …

It is very hard for true Americans to understand their positions and that is also why true Americans, thankfully, are slowly learning to distrust them more and more!

Since left-wing, secular-progressive liberals defend the rights of Islamic fanatics, adulterers, pornographers, abortionists, criminals, and communists … it would simply be counterproductive to their goals to admit that God exists … since that would force them into an indefensible position when they argue their various causes.

Progressive liberals work hard … striving for the day when the pedophiles who sodomize young boys and rape young girls are more acceptable in society than the Christian … whose horrific crime of going to Church once or twice a week, having moral standards of conduct, and trying to celebrate Christmas … earns the death sentence.

Crush a Creche

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.